PART VIInvasion of Privacy

Definitions

Marginal note:Definitions
 In this Part,
authorization means an authorization to intercept a private communication given under section 186 or subsection 184.2(3), 184.3(6) or 188(2); (autorisation)
electro-magnetic, acoustic, mechanical or other device means any device or apparatus that is used or is capable of being used to intercept a private communication, but does not include a hearing aid used to correct subnormal hearing of the user to not better than normal hearing; (dispositif électromagnétique, acoustique, mécanique ou autre)
intercept includes listen to, record or acquire a communication or acquire the substance, meaning or purport thereof; (intercepter)
offence means an offence contrary to, any conspiracy or attempt to commit or being an accessory after the fact in relation to an offence contrary to, or any counselling in relation to an offence contrary to
  • (a) any of the following provisions of this Act, namely,
    • (i) section 47 (high treason),
    • (ii) section 51 (intimidating Parliament or a legislature),
    • (iii) section 52 (sabotage),
    • (iii.1) section 56.1 (identity documents),
    • (iv) section 57 (forgery, etc.),
    • (v) section 61 (sedition),
    • (vi) section 76 (hijacking),
    • (vii) section 77 (endangering safety of aircraft or airport),
    • (viii) section 78 (offensive weapons, etc., on aircraft),
    • (ix) section 78.1 (offences against maritime navigation or fixed platforms),
    • (x) section 80 (breach of duty),
    • (xi) section 81 (using explosives),
    • (xii) section 82 (possessing explosives),
    • (xii.01) section 82.3 (possession, etc., of nuclear material, radioactive material or device),
    • (xii.02) section 82.4 (use or alteration of nuclear material, radioactive material or device),
    • (xii.03) section 82.5 (commission of indictable offence to obtain nuclear material, etc.),
    • (xii.04) section 82.6 (threats),
    • (xii.1) section 83.02 (providing or collecting property for certain activities),
    • (xii.2) section 83.03 (providing, making available, etc., property or services for terrorist purposes),
    • (xii.3) section 83.04 (using or possessing property for terrorist purposes),
    • (xii.4) section 83.18 (participation in activity of terrorist group),
    • (xii.41) section 83.181 (leaving Canada to participate in activity of terrorist group),
    • (xii.5) section 83.19 (facilitating terrorist activity),
    • (xii.51) section 83.191 (leaving Canada to facilitate terrorist activity),
    • (xii.6) section 83.2 (commission of offence for terrorist group),
    • (xii.61) section 83.201 (leaving Canada to commit offence for terrorist group),
    • (xii.62) section 83.202 (leaving Canada to commit offence that is terrorist activity),
    • (xii.7) section 83.21 (instructing to carry out activity for terrorist group),
    • (xii.8) section 83.22 (instructing to carry out terrorist activity),
    • (xii.81) subsection 83.221(1) (advocating or promoting commission of terrorism offences),
    • (xii.9) section 83.23 (harbouring or concealing),
    • (xii.91) section 83.231 (hoax — terrorist activity),
    • (xiii) section 96 (possession of weapon obtained by commission of offence),
    • (xiii.1) section 98 (breaking and entering to steal firearm),
    • (xiii.2) section 98.1 (robbery to steal firearm),
    • (xiv) section 99 (weapons trafficking),
    • (xv) section 100 (possession for purpose of weapons trafficking),
    • (xvi) section 102 (making automatic firearm),
    • (xvii) section 103 (importing or exporting knowing it is unauthorized),
    • (xviii) section 104 (unauthorized importing or exporting),
    • (xix) section 119 (bribery, etc.),
    • (xx) section 120 (bribery, etc.),
    • (xxi) section 121 (fraud on government),
    • (xxii) section 122 (breach of trust),
    • (xxiii) section 123 (municipal corruption),
    • (xxiv) section 132 (perjury),
    • (xxv) section 139 (obstructing justice),
    • (xxvi) section 144 (prison breach),
    • (xxvii) subsection 145(1) (escape, etc.),
    • (xxvii.1) section 162 (voyeurism),
    • (xxvii.2) section 162.1 (intimate image),
    • (xxviii) paragraph 163(1)(a) (obscene materials),
    • (xxix) section 163.1 (child pornography),
    • (xxix.1) section 170 (parent or guardian procuring sexual activity),
    • (xxix.2) section 171 (householder permitting sexual activity),
    • (xxix.3) section 171.1 (making sexually explicit material available to child),
    • (xxix.4) section 172.1 (luring a child),
    • (xxix.5) section 172.2 (agreement or arrangement — sexual offence against child),
    • (xxx) section 184 (unlawful interception),
    • (xxxi) section 191 (possession of intercepting device),
    • (xxxii) subsection 201(1) (keeping gaming or betting house),
    • (xxxiii) paragraph 202(1)(e) (pool-selling, etc.),
    • (xxxiv) subsection 210(1) (keeping common bawdy house),
    • (xxxv) to (xxxviii) [Repealed, 2014, c. 25, s. 11]
    • (xxxix) section 235 (murder),
    • (xxxix.1) section 244 (discharging firearm with intent),
    • (xxxix.2) section 244.2 (discharging firearm — recklessness),
    • (xl) section 264.1 (uttering threats),
    • (xli) section 267 (assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm),
    • (xlii) section 268 (aggravated assault),
    • (xliii) section 269 (unlawfully causing bodily harm),
    • (xliii.1) section 270.01 (assaulting peace officer with weapon or causing bodily harm),
    • (xliii.2) section 270.02 (aggravated assault of peace officer),
    • (xliv) section 271 (sexual assault),
    • (xlv) section 272 (sexual assault with a weapon, threats to a third party or causing bodily harm),
    • (xlvi) section 273 (aggravated sexual assault),
    • (xlvii) section 279 (kidnapping),
    • (xlvii.1) section 279.01 (trafficking in persons),
    • (xlvii.11) section 279.011 (trafficking of a person under the age of eighteen years),
    • (xlvii.2) section 279.02 (material benefit),
    • (xlvii.3) section 279.03 (withholding or destroying documents),
    • (xlviii) section 279.1 (hostage taking),
    • (xlix) section 280 (abduction of person under sixteen),
    • (l) section 281 (abduction of person under fourteen),
    • (li) section 282 (abduction in contravention of custody order),
    • (lii) section 283 (abduction),
    • (lii.1) 286.1 (obtaining sexual services for consideration),
    • (lii.2) 286.2 (material benefit from sexual services),
    • (lii.3) 286.3 (procuring),
    • (lii.4) 286.4 (advertising sexual services),
    • (liii) section 318 (advocating genocide),
    • (liv) section 327 (possession of device to obtain telecommunication facility or service),
    • (liv.1) section 333.1 (motor vehicle theft),
    • (lv) section 334 (theft),
    • (lvi) section 342 (theft, forgery, etc., of credit card),
    • (lvi.1) section 342.01 (instruments for copying credit card data or forging or falsifying credit cards),
    • (lvii) section 342.1 (unauthorized use of computer),
    • (lviii) section 342.2 (possession of device to obtain unauthorized use of computer system or to commit mischief),
    • (lix) section 344 (robbery),
    • (lx) section 346 (extortion),
    • (lxi) section 347 (criminal interest rate),
    • (lxii) section 348 (breaking and entering),
    • (lxii.1) section 353.1 (tampering with vehicle identification number),
    • (lxiii) section 354 (possession of property obtained by crime),
    • (lxiii.1) section 355.2 (trafficking in property obtained by crime),
    • (lxiii.2) section 355.4 (possession of property obtained by crime — trafficking),
    • (lxiv) section 356 (theft from mail),
    • (lxv) section 367 (forgery),
    • (lxvi) section 368 (use, trafficking or possession of forged document),
    • (lxvi.1) section 368.1 (forgery instruments),
    • (lxvii) section 372 (false information),
    • (lxviii) section 380 (fraud),
    • (lxix) section 381 (using mails to defraud),
    • (lxx) section 382 (fraudulent manipulation of stock exchange transactions),
    • (lxx.1) subsection 402.2(1) (identity theft),
    • (lxx.2) subsection 402.2(2) (trafficking in identity information),
    • (lxx.3) section 403 (identity fraud),
    • (lxxi) section 423.1 (intimidation of justice system participant or journalist),
    • (lxxii) section 424 (threat to commit offences against internationally protected person),
    • (lxxii.1) section 424.1 (threat against United Nations or associated personnel),
    • (lxxiii) section 426 (secret commissions),
    • (lxxiv) section 430 (mischief),
    • (lxxv) section 431 (attack on premises, residence or transport of internationally protected person),
    • (lxxv.1) section 431.1 (attack on premises, accommodation or transport of United Nations or associated personnel),
    • (lxxv.2) subsection 431.2(2) (explosive or other lethal device),
    • (lxxvi) section 433 (arson),
    • (lxxvii) section 434 (arson),
    • (lxxviii) section 434.1 (arson),
    • (lxxix) section 435 (arson for fraudulent purpose),
    • (lxxx) section 449 (making counterfeit money),
    • (lxxxi) section 450 (possession, etc., of counterfeit money),
    • (lxxxii) section 452 (uttering, etc., counterfeit money),
    • (lxxxiii) section 462.31 (laundering proceeds of crime),
    • (lxxxiv) subsection 462.33(11) (acting in contravention of restraint order),
    • (lxxxv) section 467.11 (participation in criminal organization),
    • (lxxxv.1) section 467.111 (recruitment of members — criminal organization),
    • (lxxxvi) section 467.12 (commission of offence for criminal organization), or
    • (lxxxvii) section 467.13 (instructing commission of offence for criminal organization),
  • (b) section 198 (fraudulent bankruptcy) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act,
  • (b.1) any of the following provisions of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention Implementation Act, namely,
    • (i) section 6 (production, etc., of biological agents and means of delivery), or
    • (ii) section 7 (unauthorized production, etc., of biological agents),
  • (c) any of the following provisions of the Competition Act, namely,
    • (i) section 45 (conspiracies, agreements or arrangements between competitors),
    • (ii) section 47 (bid-rigging), or
    • (iii) subsection 52.1(3) (deceptive telemarketing),
  • (d) any of the following provisions of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, namely,
    • (i) section 5 (trafficking),
    • (ii) section 6 (importing and exporting),
    • (iii) section 7 (production), or
    • (iv) section 7.1 (possession, sale, etc., for use in production or trafficking),
  • (d.1) section 42 (offences related to infringement of copyright) of the Copyright Act,
  • (e) section 3 (bribing a foreign public official) of the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act,
  • (f) either of the following provisions of the Customs Act, namely,
    • (i) section 153 (false statements), or
    • (ii) section 159 (smuggling),
  • (g) any of the following provisions of the Excise Act, 2001, namely,
    • (i) section 214 (unlawful production, sale, etc., of tobacco or alcohol),
    • (ii) section 216 (unlawful possession of tobacco product),
    • (iii) section 218 (unlawful possession, sale, etc., of alcohol),
    • (iv) section 219 (falsifying or destroying records),
    • (v) section 230 (possession of property obtained by excise offences), or
    • (vi) section 231 (laundering proceeds of excise offences),
  • (h) any of the following provisions of the Export and Import Permits Act, namely,
    • (i) section 13 (export or attempt to export),
    • (ii) section 14 (import or attempt to import),
    • (iii) section 15 (diversion, etc.),
    • (iv) section 16 (no transfer of permits),
    • (v) section 17 (false information), or
    • (vi) section 18 (aiding and abetting),
  • (i) any of the following provisions of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, namely,
    • (i) section 117 (organizing entry into Canada),
    • (ii) section 118 (trafficking in persons),
    • (iii) section 119 (disembarking persons at sea),
    • (iv) section 122 (offences related to documents),
    • (v) section 126 (counselling misrepresentation), or
    • (vi) section 129 (offences relating to officers),
  • (j) any offence under the Security of Information Act, or
  • (k) section 51.01 (offences related to goods, labels, packaging or services) of the Trade-marks Act,
and includes any other offence that there are reasonable grounds to believe is a criminal organization offence or any other offence that there are reasonable grounds to believe is an offence described in paragraph (b) or (c) of the definition terrorism offence in section 2; (infraction)
police officer means any officer, constable or other person employed for the preservation and maintenance of the public peace; (policier)
private communication means any oral communication, or any telecommunication, that is made by an originator who is in Canada or is intended by the originator to be received by a person who is in Canada and that is made under circumstances in which it is reasonable for the originator to expect that it will not be intercepted by any person other than the person intended by the originator to receive it, and includes any radio-based telephone communication that is treated electronically or otherwise for the purpose of preventing intelligible reception by any person other than the person intended by the originator to receive it; (communication privée)
public switched telephone network means a telecommunication facility the primary purpose of which is to provide a land line-based telephone service to the public for compensation; (réseau téléphonique public commuté)
radio-based telephone communication means any radiocommunication within the meaning of the Radiocommunication Act that is made over apparatus that is used primarily for connection to a public switched telephone network; (communication radiotéléphonique)
sell includes offer for sale, expose for sale, have in possession for sale or distribute or advertise for sale; (vendre)
solicitor means, in the Province of Quebec, an advocate or a notary and, in any other province, a barrister or solicitor. (avocat)
  • R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 183;
  •  
  •  R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), ss. 7, 23, c. 1 (2nd Supp.), s. 213, c. 1 (4th Supp.), s. 13, c. 29 (4th Supp.), s. 17, c. 42 (4th Supp.), s. 1;
  •  
  •  1991, c. 28, s. 12;
  •  
  •  1992, c. 27, s. 90;
  •  
  •  1993, c. 7, s. 5, c. 25, s. 94, c. 40, s. 1, c. 46, s. 4;
  •  
  •  1995, c. 39, s. 140;
  •  
  •  1996, c. 19, s. 66;
  •  
  •  1997, c. 18, s. 7, c. 23, s. 3;
  •  
  •  1998, c. 34, s. 8;
  •  
  •  1999, c. 2, s. 47, c. 5, s. 4;
  •  
  •  2000, c. 24, s. 43;
  •  
  •  2001, c. 32, s. 4, c. 41, ss. 5, 31, 133;
  •  
  •  2002, c. 22, s. 409;
  •  
  •  2004, c. 15, s. 108;
  •  
  •  2005, c. 32, s. 10, c. 43, s. 1;
  •  
  •  2008, c. 6, s. 15;
  •  
  •  2009, c. 2, s. 442, c. 22, s. 4, c. 28, s. 3;
  •  
  • 2010, c. 3, s. 1, c. 14, s. 2;
  •  
  •  2012, c. 1, s. 24;
  •  
  •  2013, c. 8, s. 2, c. 9, s. 14, c. 13, s. 7;
  •  
  •  2014, c. 17, s. 2, c. 25, s. 11, c. 31, s. 7, c. 32, s. 59;
  •  
  • 2015, c. 20, s. 19;
  •  
  •  2017, c. 7, s. 56.

Comments

Popular Posts

America is an idea maybe but so is a Toyota and at least the Toyota Works along with the general Asian Culture that Supports Toyota; An essay by Warren A. Lyon. April 23, 2021. An essay by Warren A. Lyon. A subway is an idea and no matter where you travel in the world, there must be some general standard that all subways follow for their accidentally both foreign and local customers so that we feel accepted, proud and validated. The London system is commensurate to the Montreal and the New York system that is commensurate to the system in Washington D.C. and the Paris system is also commensurate in terms of timeliness and efficiency, cleanliness and ease of navigation with sufficient subway information. These expectations could also be used to describe the economy where we say the economic system is validated as worthy to be praised if it satisfies effectively the general purpose of the system. The purpose of a subway in its general idea is efficient, timely, safe, comfortable transport. The purpose of an economy or the purpose of the country simply described in its general idea is the efficient, timely, safe, comfortable economic transport through life and all of life's financial experiences. This is the peace, order and the good government or the life, liberty, health and property...or happiness. This requires policy and policy that must be defended as we defend our very lives. We may require system updates sometimes and assistance from our various foreign stake holders when our economy is under performing and running recessions and we appear to say we don't know why. The reason is that we have not committed to the principle that confirms every citizen has the ability to pay and if they did have the ability to pay, why would there be any recessions or any depressions? We need to stimulate the economy but reducing lending rates below a stipulated figure that is tied to the rate on foreign debt obligations, hoping for domestic economic activity cannot achieve the goal and zero % says that Michael Jackson and George Washington (Sam Adams too) left the building. We could also say it like this. Quantitative easing is a policy to reduce the federal loan rate no lower than .5%. The fed rate is reduced to provoke consumer economic activity but the buck stop concerning rate reduction cannot be a zero rate. I was apparently zero % a week ago. The paper money, the national salaries for administration, drivers (that's me...Drivah!!!), security and cash delivery and the cost of "solver" in the coins carry an actual cost that demands payment with national revenue generating at some rate no less than .5%. It is best, however, to increase consumer activity by increasing consumer buying power, that is consumer demand for goods by increasing ATP-ABILITY To Pay in the struggle with job automation as they( the people) do not have any money already at the present time so how can they qualify for the loan if they are not enabled with the ATP via a good, national income support policy; as the effort to solve the reduction in consumer activity or increase it is a national effort; isn't it ? So, what is the point of a rate reduction if they cannot qualify and nor can they pay? We can pay for a $70,000.00 per year income support with an increase in VAT/sales tax to a more international, responsible 20% to cover the cost of the income support. We can use this sales tax mechanism to increase and decrease consumer activity. Raising sales tax reduces activity. Decreasing the sales tax rate increases the consumer activity(ACTIVITIES); never lower than 20% and never higher than 100%. bosom https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/bosom We can keep discussing Aboriginal emotions nonetheless. You have shown a national dedication to a reduction in the fed rate so you are actually reducing national GDP further. This is not good. It is best to raise the ATP(ability to pay); a new economic concept coined by Warren A. Lyon. Warren is a student of Adam Smith, Keynes and Sunkel, Wallerstein also. The banks an the economy itself would prefer a customer who can maintain a loan or make a real cash payment ever so often above and beyond a customer who cannot. They should not think that the income support reduces bank business or that a shortage of income support increases business and loan applications when it does not really increase business when the unpaid loan is unpaid business debt and is a business loan that is a business right off. Also, how do the citizens without income support qualify for the loans? How do they pay the loans? Our financial service systems and processes of mortgage/vivregage and loan qualification need to evolve to match the Automation economy/ primarily income support in an ATP economy. The income support is not a threat to the loan industry. It is the ability to pay the loan. It is essential to the bank's general host economy. This ability to pay is essential bank business. CN Tower.....Say whaaaaaaaat ????? This is shockery!!! Where are the good white people who could manage the economy positively? I need their help. Send a smoke signal. Beat the drum from Gondor. Blow the goat horn. They, the good white people, must have been killed off by the cave man white; but when? We also need to understand America as an experiment and an idea which is now concluded if its still only just an idea after 230 years according to those who are obligated to make it more than an idea. The idea has failed with the evidence borne out in the debacle of quantitative easing. See our more recent article on the topic. This is evidence of a lot of dead intelligent white people who would have prevented this quantitative shenanigan. Quantitative Easing is a policy attempt at economic stimulus by reducing the fed rates to zero %, hoping for more consumer activity. It is a hole in the bucket policy. If it's possible, it says the Federal Reserve does not really exist and is just a Chimera for some other system that requires the maintenance of the actual debt obligations. The American Fed is really just for dornestic emotional consumption; that there might be something hegemonic and American still deciding how to influence the economy but to the detriment of America only; to albeit impeach American integrity. Who is the system architect responsible? You can take care of one little girl. But all your men, Captain, are already dead. A zero % Fed rate says you, the American, with all of your echo bravo bravado forgot about the cost of the paper and the coins and you also forgot about your debt obligations that Carey a higher rate than 0%. So, what should the rate be then today; if we mean our Global partners well? To avoid shock in the lending rates increases to 17%, we should increase the ability to pay to the requisite number of $200,000.00 per year for every North American as set down by the real managers of the economy so there is no shock when the rate rises to the real buck stop number of 17%. If you wanted to stimulate spendings, you give people money instead of hoping people with no money in an already dead horse economy will spend on credit with low interest rates. The next question is how do they pay the bill? So, we resolve to ensure the markets with on-going spending stimulation as this is the cut your nose to spite your face concern. As we ensure the markets, we call this, in the life of the consumer, the ability to pay or the ATP also known as actual, real consumer demand. This manifests as the income support paid to every citizen equally at an amount that sustains their Maslow needs. Money itself is a Maslow need as it is necessary to acquire the other needs now in the Maslow-Lyon hierarchy of needs. To show our Authority from day to day affecting the economy and performance, we could play with the fed rates but there has to be a set minimum that covers all debt national obligation and the rate on that debt as well as the general cost of operations with big big bigger huge huge job salaries. Excitingly, we can also tickle the economy by rising and lowering sales tax to influence consumer spending but the sales tax as a key source of revenue cannot be lower than the debt rates. The income support stays generally constant but will increase at 2% per year with the average rate of inflation as delineated by the consumer price index (what is that?). Combines that cause unusually high price increases in markets are called Market Price Abuses that Could cause a general system crises, affecting the standard rate of inflation unusually. We presume that with the phenomenon of white hegemony as an unofficial formality in previous hiring processes also evident and now concluded, we cannot blame the imaginary White House butler (that's me!!!!) for the economy in North America that suffered a relatively seamless foreclosure and European Asian reinvention from 2001 to 2018. The issue was to see if the North American could at least find his own self saving policies that supported the lives of the population and also need for constant regular recession cancelling stimulus and the old black Mammy running a Chicken and Waffles shop in the Carolinas could have balanced this system with good intentions. She is my mother. So, we give up on white presumptuously as being capable of carrying or reciting the answer in America. My white restaurant managers could have solved the economy with good motivation. The bus drivers, white or black, running the subway or most of them could have solved it with good intentions. So, where are the people who could cooperate and write the requisite policy? Never mind; we have policy now that provides sufficient ATP; that is economic stimulus for the Economy. The simple answer was to just extend the Minnesota economy across all of North America; all of North America as Minnesota has one of the higher rates of positive economic performance and is contributing nearly more than 1/10 to national gross domestic product with regular high total full price real revenue vehicle sales. This is also true for Wisconsin while places like Arkansas and Missouri manifest deficits and high Vehicle theft from dealerships also. Click here.