Inefficiency is not independence and who would try to run his country on that notion of independence being inefficiency and old diesel train and automotive delivery transport technology? Isn't it good to save money and maybe also to save the air, water and land and the fish that you enjoy in your uh...native lands? Maybe I am native too who went the displacement, the moving and the replacement while moved to other lands and then brought back after being dipped genetically in another dna's appearance. What do you think although now we are a bit more Northern Japanese, Korean, Japanese or West Indian but really Great Lakes native? We don't know but how can you, I mean to say we, have any people after total automation if you do not have basic income? Total automation is a concept coined by Warren A. Lyon that involves the capability of machinery to not only take on the majority of the work involved in building a consumer vehicle but also a machine's actual utilization to do so across the spectrum of automotive production. It reduces the demand for human labor, the reduction in the utilization of human labor and the reduction of consumer buying power as a result of the loss in the human's use as labor in the industrial process as they are displaced by this positive technology that brings with it the positive corollary solution of basic income that is capitalism's solution for a capitalist economy since cost savings in production is a capitalist money saving motive for the ultimate end result which is capitalist consumer joy and to capitalist consumer joy you need viable consumers who are not left as expendable in some game of Americano political indecision never seen before, nothing like it, that results in economic desperation where movie characters as of 2000 start confessing the experiences of the high and the low in the economic experience of desperation of the average American. In the process, we could play an 'over you and under me' game in our self concepts with France in our souls at the top as 'over you' in this world as socio-economic actors or as politicians and you need to do something, you say, keep something down 'under you' to be in parity or self accepting but if you are a billionaire industrialist or politician, then the citizen who is getting $60,000.00 basic income will always be under you even if he figures out how to save his money and put a down payment on the consumer home that will be available to him on a 50 years mortgage with a reasonable monthly payment which is really good for some people whose ancestry has eschewed home ownership for too long now. See the Ozark season 2 for some absolutely brilliant socio-economic and anthropological evidence with intelligent, humane and sympathetic direction. Our prays as we pray for the powers appointed by God where the power as for the people and by the people is prayer for the people as that power. SEE JEREMIAH 33 where it says He will restore their fortunes and will have mercy upon them and this would have to be in whatever Americano socio-economic desperation or wilderness they have run up into. Forget the Anglos who are trying to keep you as under them while the Irish and the Scots have plugged and satisfied the gap in the economy with the basic income in the Perfect Spirit of international capitalism. It's good the churches when people can enjoy having entered his oasis of economic rest as you now sit at the water and will no longer refuse to drink from the well of basic income when you do have the permission to put in the basic income. It is God's will!! It is God's will!! Have you seen the movie the Kingdom of Heaven? You are not Guy De Lusion; are you? Are you his son or daughter? But, if you were French, you would have solved this economy by now. You need to obey the Perfect Spirit of International Capitalism and its hard when your reverence and resentment of French socio-cultural and economic superiority in your emotions as you self describe it keeps you decorating French and resenting their logic as you and your people starve in a self determination that is really resistance and resentment to what is older and over you and that does really work with the notion of family in French culture superseding the movement and the diffused wills of individuals that fragments the work of the communal best in quick decision making for the whole country and greater communities too often as too divided to just do what would be good for all. Do I have to put up more videos of French subways and photos also where you see all kinds of people enjoying French socio-economics with basic income? Do I have to put up more videos of Asia with all kinds of people enjoying Asian Socio-economics with basic income? Il n'est pas difficile Monsieur mais Le Chien mange' ton diner. Go deh!

Inefficiency is not independence and who would try to run his country on that notion of independence being inefficiency and old diesel train and automotive delivery  transport  technology?  Isn't it good to save money and maybe also to save the air, water and land and the fish that you enjoy in your uh...native lands?  Maybe I am native too who went the displacement, the moving and the replacement while moved to other lands and then brought back after being dipped genetically in another dna's appearance.  What do you think although now we are a bit more Northern Japanese, Korean,  Japanese or West Indian but really Great Lakes native?   We don't know but how can you, I mean to say we,  have any people after total automation  if you do not have basic income?  Total automation is a concept coined by Warren A. Lyon that involves the capability of machinery to not only take on the majority of the work involved in building a consumer vehicle but also a machine's actual utilization to do so across the spectrum of automotive production.  It reduces the demand for human labor, the reduction in the utilization of human labor and the reduction of consumer buying power as a result of the loss in the human's use as labor in the industrial process as they are displaced by this positive technology that brings with it the positive corollary solution of basic income that is capitalism's solution for a capitalist economy since cost savings in production is a capitalist money saving motive for the ultimate end result which is capitalist consumer joy and to capitalist consumer joy you need viable consumers who are not left as expendable in some game of Americano political indecision  never seen before, nothing like it,  that results in economic desperation where movie characters as of 2000 start confessing the experiences of the high and the low in the economic experience of desperation of the average American.  In the process, we could play an 'over you and under me' game in our self concepts with France in our souls at the top as 'over you' in this world as socio-economic actors or as politicians and you need to do something, you say,  keep something down 'under you' to be in parity or  self accepting  but if you are a billionaire industrialist or politician, then the citizen who is getting $60,000.00 basic income will always be under you even if he figures out how to save his money and put a down payment on the consumer home that will be available to him on a 50 years mortgage with a reasonable monthly payment which is really good for some people whose ancestry has eschewed home ownership for too long now. See the Ozark season 2 for some  absolutely brilliant socio-economic and anthropological evidence with intelligent, humane and sympathetic direction.  Our prays as we pray for the powers appointed by God where the power as for the people and by the people is  prayer for the people as that power. SEE JEREMIAH 33 where it says He will restore their fortunes and will have mercy upon them  and this would have to be in whatever Americano socio-economic desperation or wilderness they  have run up into. Forget the Anglos who are trying to keep you as under them while the Irish and the Scots have plugged and satisfied the gap in the economy with the basic income in the Perfect Spirit of international capitalism. It's good the churches when people can enjoy having entered his oasis of economic rest as you now sit at the water and will no longer refuse to drink from the well of basic income when you do have the permission to put in the basic income.  It is God's will!! It is God's will!! Have you seen the movie the Kingdom of Heaven? You are not Guy De Lusion; are you? Are you his son or daughter?     But, if you were French, you would have solved this economy by now.  You need to obey the Perfect Spirit of International Capitalism and its hard when your reverence and resentment of French socio-cultural and economic superiority in your emotions as you self describe it keeps you decorating  French and resenting their logic as you and your people starve in a self determination that is really resistance and resentment to what is older and over you and that does really work with the notion of family in French culture superseding the movement and the diffused wills of individuals that fragments the work of the communal best in quick decision making for the whole country and greater communities too often as too divided to just do what would be good for all. Do I have to put up more videos of French subways and photos also where you see all kinds of people enjoying French socio-economics with basic income?  Do I have to put up more videos of Asia with all kinds of people enjoying Asian Socio-economics with basic income? Il n'est pas difficile Monsieur mais  Le Chien mange' ton diner.   Go deh!






Comments

Popular Posts

So, the hegemony machines are arguing but they need to agree every so often. The issue is that when they do not agree, at least 100,000 Americans have to die in a war of some kind as arranged since 1901. In our current hegemony debate the Engine company with its machine in Germany has won the logic game again. There are only 4 people on any vehicle assembly line as workers any where in the world. But, the Fuel company's machine in America is just as resistant to change as Robert E. Lee. Abraham Lincoln was as logical as the engine company's machine but that was a different argument in another generation although the issue was also logic; not a way of life. The fuel company's machine is afraid of and resistant to change as it wants absolute control of the present and future but what good is fuel like whale oil if it cannot power the vehicle? The vehicle runs on hydrogen; maybe propane. The fuel company is resisting diversification but has already taken a strong stake in these other fuels(hydrogen and Propane) since they are being used widely in every other part of the world. There is a hydrogen pump on every major car dealership's property; for now anyway. Eventually, the pumps will be available elsewhere at Total gas stations or at Texaco or Fina in addition to Exxon Mobil. they have the best coffee. Are you tying to ambush people with a cup of coffee? Do it again? Do it again? What is the color of the gulf of Mexico after Blue Water horizon? Now, if the fuel company bought all the mobile phone companies in America, it would make much more profit than it now makes selling oil and gasoline from any source at all of its various stations in the world. If profit is your motive, who is resistant to change? But, if control is your motive then you might throw out the 100,000 or more high school graduates as soldiers in a war along with the hydrogen technology( the baby drivers with the bath water). The machine is eating human legs from dead soldiers dating back to WW 2 and the Vietnam soldiers did not help youthful regeneration since the Nam soldiers' legs had a lot of DDT. They might have run out of legs again but it has decided to eat sheep now that are 18 years old after the said sheep give birth to about three litters. This sounds like Science fiction but what is more unbelievable is that they stole my Audi a4(2002); innit? They thought it might have been secretive or special. Now, hydrogen fuel vehicles and the pumps and the economy offer the same cash savings as fuel free mobile phones. Just use the hydrogen! Just make the money nigga white troglodyte monkey Texa bouy! Rostrom clot! Now the last issue is that you don't believe, in your religious confusion, that people will work at all if there is no death economy that involves dirty oil rigs and fuel trucks and oil rail cars and ships. But, they will work and you will be sure to make them sweat doing something; even if it is standing at the airport as travel companions or personal assistants or androids with a bluetooth chip surgically plugged into their nose; innit? Now, the Vehicle company machine and the oil company machine need people to have $25,000.00 per year basic income or else there will be blood but for all the wrong reasons. You can give your George Washington High School graduate an additional $1000.00 per month as his retainer in his service agreement to sit at your back door and watch tv and enjoy your AC at night and he will also make breakfast while wearing his FUBU dress shirt. It looks like the GAP shirt though really; innit? This is in addition to his basic income and he will promise to buy only a Tacoma truck or the Ford built on the same platforms. Your son will buy the Lexus. So, chill Winston. Travel will grow as an industry. You will make them do something and your amazon stuff will arrive and maybe you will have people standing at your front door on basic income from the government and the society in which you live with its new socio-religious industrial complex as you speak in tongues that respect His(God's) wisdom; not your religious illiteracy as Abraham's adoption but not his in-grafted son by the Holy Spirit (Glory!!!!!!)since how could you be anything but the child of the devil if you refuse to enter Eden when God has shown you the way? Didn't He say he would show you a more excellent way? You are not impressing anyone while you plan to run off to a cave after you set the fuse to blow up the world! No, the legislation for basic income was passed in 1936 and is still legitimate in the United States. It was passed at the same time the Energy and Fuel company got into ensuring or backing the US government with the Crude Oil Standard.