Search This Blog
Ending the separateness among the religions; a good Masonic purpose...that we might love our neighbor and live in peace. Did you know Warren was Christened in the Catholic Church? contact: email: w.a.lyon.angelronan@gmail.com w.a.lyon.londinium@gmail.com. Tel: 1-647-701-9478. Unless noted otherwise, All Posts are written by Warren A. Lyon who is Catholic
Posts
Showing posts from May, 2018
What is Basic Income and why do we need it
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
2018 Archdiocese of Military Services Memorial Day Mass
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Christian King Deals with Muslims | The Message Movie Scene [HD]
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Aspiration Attainment(TM) is a new trademark at Real George Consulting. You will have children who will aspire as you aspire and who will attain to help you attain if you expect that it is your right to work together as a family and sell a pot of rice and chicken until you become the Real Long Bay Jerk Rotisserie (TM) or Lloyd, Familia and Honors Law Firm where you will tell your son or nephew in his wisdom to be discrete and enjoy you as a front office sales person while he does the grunt work and court attendances that he can collect the understood fee of $1000.00 and give you the $500.00, let you know the person's name and number and court details and you will do the rest for the remainder of the file or you tell him that you want 60 % of fees on the $5000.00 for the entire family law file and he will contract the travels and paper costs, some of the, and the son will get only 40% and you will feel big at the golf course and everybody will be so proud that he will not even have to talk about the business so much or he will just refer people to you and you will make a 50% fee arrangement. Otherwise, after he gets a C in the next life when you are reincarnated and he is reincarnated, your need for social acceptance will have to be muted to your community's ultimate addiction to aspiration and not attainment or realization and if he does get the C, then that is ok since right now when you kill him after he becomes the lawyer or the orchestra piano virtuoso after the A, you will save us all a lot of time if you kill the children who will be born tomorrow and who may be admonished by you to achieve and aspire and get an A in the next 6 years and it might be better if you just give everyone basic income and politely just tell the Brown people to forget any concerns about the professions but to just focus on public service jobs with all of their evident and equal capability and this is good for the white; I mean Beige people who do not want the education as the children of Herod and who are the authority and who want to just walk into the surgery and be a surgeon or the library and just take the job and tell the head staffer that they were hired last week and to do the same in all other professions since this is their authority to get you convicted and not read the file and set it down for a jury trial while there was an evident and credible evidence entitling the good Judge to strike the plea but there is no point killing any children until they get an A since it would be better in those days with this resistance of human potential in the white and black Western Hemispheric communities if you just hammer them on the day the report card says A for anything or maybe just be decisive now to be content with whatever they achieve and do not feel threatened or think that any child who receives an A or that graduates is a mother f"3ker since you are wasting your time and maybe just send the children away and get a Chewbacca or a cat or a dog and that it might be better if you were not born and you should run to the hills maybe in this day or the next where there is basic income or just be content with the children as they try their best and without my parents's admonition, I probably would have been an ambulance driver etc but with their admonition people watched the aspiration with great interest and the estuary girl just opened my front door who hopes to extort me into being her husband in her estuary culture and she has five minutes to....get your things but you are not a wife yet or an Egyptian or maybe you are not even a human being when you want to ask someone after his essay entitled Legitimacy, what is legitimacy...what is legitimacy. Well, it is when you have no education but you have enough common sense if required to run a school, to run a school that feels like people are treated in the same way that you wish to be treated and if you run a town or country, you will run the country with an ethos that feels like the best school in the world for your people all over the world and not like the poorest and dilapidated school or the school where everything is new but nobody knows how to read and where all the people are opiate addicts; the Theoden School vs. the quiet school of simple functionality that could feel like the school where everyone can be a confident customer service agent who will not try to personally edit real life or the customer base to fit his expectations of an all white, under-educated world maybe where you are supposed to know that he really has no time for any ethnic minorities in the economy while he slapped a lot of hands in gym class and who is unable to fulfill a simple job without editing the population at the DMV for a few dollars more to say that he should be more...more cat hair maybe but as dark as he is and then that would be fine and he cannot a put a finger on what has turned his population along with him into a turbine of depopulation since it is just evil. What he does not know is that when Apple told his generation to kill their parents or anyone over 30 years old, Apple also told people over 30 to put insurance on their children and kill their children if they ever got an A in High School or grade school if they are white and everybody is on E in the coffee water or they take enough to take a pill to just chill!
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
From the Fall of Dinos to the Rise of Humans
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
After all of our teachings, there will still be the evil Guyanese White American cut out type who has the Perry Mason look like Cutter who will lock Dave out of the space station airlock in competition and say he does not know what happened. This is the average inconsistency of the average human being who could have bad motivators and we need to know who they are beyond a certain safety grade in what human work remains. There will always be a Cain, a Saul, a bad son named Amnon, Absalom or 11 brothers who may try to kill your dream when you tell them you have a dream that one day, Herod will forgive his mother's death as a Black man or the Herod as a white man. Herod is the best critic of this world and its system as influenced by Jeroboam's more Sauline motives( As in King Saul) as a non Israeli King of Israel who used the same temptation as seen in the wilderness with Moses that involved the one golden calf and the death and pleasure while Jeroboam offered two calves in two different temples with the death and passion. Herod is his son and Jeroboam's heir while Boadicea or any Pict woman and victim provided the egg. While Jeroboam's sin is recorded in the bible and the judgement against him, his predilection to attain position without a servant's heart for the betterment of his people is still here with us in the guise of a resistant pseudo religious victim's authority (as seen in the JW's in America who could be the multi-complexioned children of dead native Amerindian women but who resist the simple socio-economic answer but you are having a party and you ask the other children if they want to come as you reverberate some sense of determined displacement or continual searching for community; Want to come?) who as Herod and his dna is all over the world, telling you that he does not understand how it is lawful to heal anyone on the sabbath while it may be the spirit of the law since it may be written but it is not in the only teaching Herod and the Sanhedrin may have in the abbreviated ten equations of communal living known as the Ten commandments that can be summarized as the law that saves life known as the Pikuach nefesh but a son of Levite and a true Heir would have to know these things since we truly only do what we see the Father doing and He saves life not only worshipfully on the sabbath but every day of the week and you really, as adoptions, should be imitators of Him since we are all now Heirs in the spirit and Herod's dead mother who was dead when he was conceived from her eggs that lived beyond her death needs to be honored as her Pictish blood cries out like Abel's from the grave. So, now Herod shall show us his rendition in the authority given to the victim's people just what the answer shall be for us all except for nuclear winds and poisoned oceans since you must forgive Herod as you wish to be forgiven and he who is without sin shall cast the first Tomahawk hatchet, not missile, another day. Are you now telling your children to chant that they are Kings and to eschew education in your authority but you cannot solve an equation that involves your dead ancestral Pict mother's human value?; bumbuclot! So, greater things you shall do, forgive as you wish to be forgiven or you will kill yourself immediately or slowly with poisons in the pain sown into your flesh due to the death in your flesh as born from a dead woman's egg. This sin is acknowledged and Herod and his children receive an apology before you continue to say you do not understand the purpose of the law is life and to save life where there is no law against saving life but civilization would have to offer life and friendship when it comes in peace but then kill if you resisted at Dover and threw stones from a position of superior elevation and killed the bearer of peace and also your certain future and there will be a road, a subway system or underground system, automated bread bakeries, robotic vacuums, viaducts, PONT du Gard, hot and cold Roman Levitical running water, a road and basic income, a space station but on the moon as the ISS moon base for truly long term observations of life outside of earth's atmosphere and at less cost. But, the dragon fly with all of those solar fans and insufficient fuel cells is great; great idea but have you seen the modular ship concept as proposed by the relative of...well, he proposed a modular design to be built on the earth and then assembled in space that would lo lo feel more...look more...look more...it looks more like 2001 a Space Odyssey or what you have been pushing on people with good motivators in Star Wars; innit? Cheers. Halleluljah! Well, I have to go and watch the Ozark season 2 on Netflix. Thank God for the life, basic income, the health and property. Amen!
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
By Warren A. Lyon. The fault in American history that has caused so much unspoken iteration for redress by the White native in the dichotomy between properly and legally non- racialised Constitutional law, Citizen's Rights and actual lived experience is that in 1619, the European person in spite of complexion who was therefore also legally Christian was not subject to any slavery. The non-racialised truth of our heraldry, ancestry with a multi-complexioned smorgasbord of dna subsumed in Roman jurisprudential peace is fettered by the late post video technology, media induced Fascism of "so long as they look like me or have my hair" that is affecting. Non-racialised economies but not the good (but subject to human error or frailty) non-racialised work in educational provision. The global kinship work of coca cola continues to keep us focused on our mutual, universal humanity. As such we read history and see that Black Europeans like Anthony Jackson owned slaves like Cassor. You were born in 1978 maybe and you can't say your ancestor was Anthony Jackson or Cassor. You are not sure and you are White; I mean to say Beige. Maybe you are Brown or Native in appearance as the fascism of "so long as they look like me" is over. But, the honor of the Monarch, roi or Reine is not divorced from the honor of his multi-complexioned and capable people who have his or their collective and common wisdom in applying basic income to their socio-economic formulai in honoring the Monarch with gratitude after industrial automation. After Automation, The Royal Houses of Europe, including Aragon, thought you would have noticed. This simplicity may seem to fall on deaf ears after the E drug and the phenomenon of De-education. Click here to read more.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
In 1772, the groundbreaking legal case Somerset v Stewart swept away all legal justification for slavery within England. No law allowed a master to use compulsion against his so-called slaves. Lord Mansfield's judgement was comparatively dry and technical, but the poet William Cowper later expressed it more eloquently: Slaves cannot breathe in England; if their lungs Receive our air, that moment they are free: They touch our country and their shackles fall The Somerset case sent shockwaves through the English-speaking world. Two years later in 1774 a similar case, Knight v Wedderburn, was brought in Scotland; and soon established that slavery was not legal in Scotland either, just as it was not legal in England. Newspapers in the Thirteen Colonies brought news of the judgement there, and it caused great alarm. The British government in Westminster was already seeking to extend centralised control, with its Stamp Act and other much-disliked measures. If slavery was legal in America but illegal in England, how soon would it be before Westminster tried to apply the same law in both places? Worse still, how long before the slaves themselves started to get unwelcome ideas about freedom? In January 1773, the slaves of Massachusetts sent a petition to the General Court asking for relief from their 'unhappy state and condition' — the first of five such measures. By September of that year, a Virginia slave owner advertising in the newspaper for help recapturing two runaway slaves, noted with exasperation that they "will endeavour to get out of the Colony, particularly to Britain, where they imagine they will be free (a notion now too prevalent among the Negroes, greatly to the Vexation and Prejudice of their Masters)". A year later another advertisement for a runaway in Georgia said specifically that he would probably "attempt to get on board some Vessel bound for Great Britain, from the Knowledge he has of the late Determination of Somerset's Case". In September 1774 Abigail Adams wrote to her husband that a 'conspiracy of the Negroes' had just been discovered, by which they offered to form a militia to support the British royal governor in Massachusetts if he would promise them their freedom and give them weapons. In 1775, as unrest gathered. the governor of Virginia Lord Dunmore actually went ahead and formed a regiment of ‘Ethiopians’, promising freedom to the former slaves of rebels who escaped from their masters. If even illiterate slaves in the Deep South knew about Somerset's Case and were using it as a justification for escape — or worse, perhaps for rebellion — then this was clearly a crisis for American slaveowners. It might not be enough in itself to provoke rebellion, but it was another straw on the camel's back. When the Declaration of Independence was written, one of the main charges levelled against King George was that "He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us" — by offering the hope of freedom to the slaves. 3.1k Views · View Upvoters Related QuestionsMore Answers Below How do they teach the American Revolution in the U.K.? If the British won the American Revolutionary War, would slavery in America have lasted as long as it did? How important was slavery as an issue in the American War of Independence? What percentage of people in America owned slaves at the peak of slavery? Why did the United States lose the Vietnam War? Ask New Question Kiani Francis Kiani Francis, works at Glasgow Answered Jul 20 2016 · Upvoted by Carrington Ward, Ph.D Diplomatic History & History of the United States of America (2008) · Author has 545 answers and 610.8k answer views The British declared the rebels to be traitors & thus their property was forfeited including their slaves (George Washington owned 318). Consequently many black soldiers joined the British Army. Later many ran away to join the Royal Marines. When the British lost the black Loyalists settled in Saskatchewan & many came to London & took English wives. Slavery was abolished in the British Empire in 1833 & in the USA after the Civil war in 1865. The Somerset Case in 1772 declared slavery illegal in England (& that it had NEVER been legal since the Statute of Westminster 1101), after a public anti slavery campaign led by Granville Sharp. So it would certainly have been a logical move for Washington, Jefferson & the other slave owners to rebel & for their slaves to fight for Britain. In fact one of Washington's slaves called Henry Washington actually did run away to fight for Britain. Similarly Native Americans were consistently better treated by the British & Canadians than by the USA. 421 Views · View Upvoters Daniel Baker Daniel Baker, M.A. in European History, George Mason University Answered Jul 20 2016 · Upvoted by Carrington Ward, Ph.D Diplomatic History & History of the United States of America (2008) · Author has 1.8k answers and 2.8m answer views There was no reason to believe in the 1770s that Britain would outlaw slavery at any time in the foreseeable future. Although the continental slave owners weren’t represented in Parliament, the fabulously wealthy sugar planters of Barbados, Jamaica, Antigua, and other British colonies in the Caribbean were very well represented, since many of them were absentee landowners who lived in Britain. Those sugar planters depended on slavery, and nobody expected them to let an abolition bill get through Parliament. And indeed they did successfully defend slavery in Parliament, right down to 1832 and the Reform Act which cost the nobility much of their influence and allowed abolition to finally pass the next year. But nobody could have foreseen the Reform Act in the 1770s. In any case, the main hotbed of revolution in America was Massachusetts, where slavery barely existed. Even in the more slavery-dependent South, many of the planters had imbibed Enlightenment-era ideas and saw slavery as a necessary evil that they hoped to get rid of, once they figured out a way to do it without losing their wealthy position. Unfortunately, that attitude would begin to change rapidly after the introduction of the cotton gin in 1793, but that was long after the War of Independence. Ultimately, slavery wasn’t much of an issue either way in the Revolution; many slave owners were loyalists, like Joseph Brant and James Chalmers, while some, like Washington and Jefferson, joined the revolutionaries. 624 Views · View Upvoters Sara Matthews Sara Matthews, Teacher/Student American history, American literature and ELL Answered Jul 22 2016 · Author has 10.4k answers and 3.7m answer views As Joseph Boyle points out - it wasn't given as a reason and one might think there'd be some hint of it along the way. The impact of Somerset v. Stewart was to create an anti-slavery movement in England but this is occurring after the Revolution - over in 1781. Cowper writes his poem in 1785 and in 1776 slavery is alive and thriving in the British empire if not on English soil - and powerful voices in England support slavery in the Empire as they were indeed owners of slaves in the Caribbean. Prior to the Revolution - roughly 2% of Massachusetts' population were slaves in contrast to 40% of Virginia's population. The two hotbeds of revolution were Massachusetts - where slavery barely existed - and then Virginia - though Virginia was hardly the only slave-owning colony. Virginia's planters were tobacco planters and heavily in debt to British merchants and struggling with low tobacco prices sources suggest their letters and thoughts are consumed with that worry - their debts being called in and having no way to pay them. 409 Views · View Upvoters · Answer requested by Daniel Baker Joseph Boyle Joseph Boyle Answered Jul 21 2016 · Author has 25.2k answers and 18.1m answer views Somerset v Stewart says some historians believe “the case contributed to increasing colonial support for separatism…, by parties on both sides of the slavery question” and “some individuals in pro-slavery and anti-slavery colonies, for opposite reasons, desired a distinct break from English law in order to achieve their goals with regard to slavery”. By 1784, 3 of the 4 largest Northern states had abolished slavery. If the Somerset decision caused fears among slaveholders, they did not list this as their reason to revolt and neither did the British state abolition as a goal. If the planters’ only desire was to keep slaves working their plantations, they would have done much better not to revolt and just continue as the West Indies did for another 60+ years, by which time the Northern states had turned against slavery in the South. 684 Views · View Upvoters · Answer requested by Daniel Baker Douglas C. Miller Douglas C. Miller, I have been reading history for over 50 years Answered Jul 23 2016 · Author has 1k answers and 577.2k answer views Several of the answers here affirm the proposition that a threat that Britain might try to ban slavery was a significant motivation for the revolution. This is essentially an economic argument and there have been other interpretations claiming economic motives as the primary cause of the revolution. I think this is too simple; economists or economic historians like to make economic motivations the primary ones for many historical events but they ignore other powerful motivations. While New England may have been a key player in the slave trade Sam Adams and his ilk were mostly not rich ship owners or builders and did not depend on the slave trade for their livelihood. Parliamentary arrogance in imposing taxes where none had previously existed produced political motives for rebellion, overshadowing economic ones. The s is true of John Adams and middle class attorneys and other professionals like him as well. Ben Franklin was not involved in the slavezs trade as well. I think one can't rule out some small role for this issue in helping along the revolution, but I can't see it as primary or even close at all. 412 Views · View Upvoters · Answer requested by Daniel Baker Chris Marciano Chris Marciano, US citizen Answered Jul 20 2016 · Author has 131 answers and 44.2k answer views Not at all. An early draft of the Declaration said that George III was responsible for "the sin of slavery." Many founding fathers hated slavery, but left it out in order to unify the colonies. South Carolina was a hold out in voting for independence.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
The Sunday Mass - Pentecost - May 20, 2018
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Judge Jeanine: Clinton is about to face a real investigation
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
A tour of the Mahane Yehuda Market, Jerusalem, Israel
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
The Context Bible - Lesson 12: John 5:22 - 6:40
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Christ's Authority is Questioned - The Parable of The Two Sons
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
We only do what we see the Father doing....do you not attend church to be healed by the word of God on Sabbath? Is it a sin for the Lord's word to be spoken on the Sabbath....and for the word spoken to heal you on the Sabbath? JESUS QUESTIONED BY PHARISEES FOR HEALING ON SABBATH (9)
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Campbells Velish Soup TV commercial from 2002
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Guy Standing | Rentier Capitalism and Basic Income
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Experiment with Universal Basic Income: From idea to implementation | AS...
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Mike Pence Swears in Seema Verma head Medicare and Medicaid
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
White House Press briefing likely on Giuliani interview, Michael Cohen, ...
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
The Sunday Mass - 5th Sunday of Easter - April 29, 2018
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Jonathan Cahn - Part 1: Isaiah 53 Mysteries about Jesus the Messiah
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps